Security-First Nat. Bank of Los Angeles v. King
This text of 15 P.2d 1112 (Security-First Nat. Bank of Los Angeles v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case has been heard on motion to dismiss filed by defendants in error. The principal ground of the motion raises questions that evidently were decided against plaintiff in error by the order of the District Court which we are asked to review. The decision of those questions here requires a consideration of the merits of the proceeding in error.
We have heretofore held that we should not assume ordinarily to decide the merits of a case on a motion to dismiss. Enos v. Keating, 36 Wyo. 318, 255 Pac. 1. The *96 motion will be denied with the understanding that points thereby raised may receive further consideration when the case is heard on the merits.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 P.2d 1112, 45 Wyo. 93, 1932 Wyo. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-first-nat-bank-of-los-angeles-v-king-wyo-1932.