Security Bank v. Bell
21 N.W. 470, 32 Minn. 409, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 181
This text of 21 N.W. 470 (Security Bank v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Security Bank v. Bell, 21 N.W. 470, 32 Minn. 409, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 181 (Mich. 1884).
Opinion
There was no conflict in the evidence as to the transaction upon which the note sued on was given, and there is no question that it showed an entire want of consideration.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gage v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co.
194 N.W. 769 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1923)
First National Bank of Poteau v. Allen
1923 OK 46 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Luing v. Peterson
172 N.W. 692 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1919)
Bank of Montreal v. Beecher
157 N.W. 1070 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1916)
First State Bank of Nortonville v. Morton
142 S.W. 694 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1912)
Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Van Valkenburg
126 N.W. 119 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)
Turle v. Sargent
65 N.W. 349 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1895)
Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Dedrick
63 N.W. 1110 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1895)
Lipsmeier v. Vehslage
29 F. 175 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri, 1886)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 N.W. 470, 32 Minn. 409, 1884 Minn. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/security-bank-v-bell-minn-1884.