Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Todd

79 So. 560, 118 Miss. 575
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a reconsideration of the matter, we are of the opinion that the court below should have allowed appellant credit for the expenses necessarily incurred by it in collecting the several collateral notes amounting to the sum of three • hundred fifty-four dollars and twenty-two cents, so that to that extent the suggestion of error will be sustained, the judgment heretofore rendered will be set aside, and the decree of the lower court modified accordingly-

Sustained in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Todd, 79 So. 560, 118 Miss. 575 (Mich. 1918).

79 So. 560 (Security Bank & Trust Co. v. Todd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fourmeaux v. Clark-Roscher Hardware Supply Co.
17 So. 2d 731 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1944)