Security Bank of Pulaski County v. Pangea, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Security Bank of Pulaski County v. Pangea, Inc.

198 S.W.3d 620, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1041, 2006 WL 1827431

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 5, 2006

DocketED 86769

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 S.W.3d 620 (Security Bank of Pulaski County v. Pangea, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Security Bank of Pulaski County v. Pangea, Inc., 198 S.W.3d 620, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1041, 2006 WL 1827431 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Security Bank of Pulaski County (Bank) appeals from the judgment entered by the trial court upon the granting of summary judgment in favor of Pangea, Inc., d/b/a Pangea Group, Inc., (Pangea) on Bank’s claims for damages and an accounting arising out of an Assignment of Contract Proceeds between Bank and J & C Electrical. We affirm. 1

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error without merit. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The Amended Judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. Bank's motion to strike Pangea’s appendix is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI