Securities v. Harris
96 F. App'x 778
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 13, 2004·No. No. 03-6109·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
For substantially the reasons stated by Judge Schwartz in his January 31, 2003 Memorandum Order granting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s motion for a default judgment against appellants, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Securities v. Harris, 96 F. App'x 778 (2d Cir. 2004).
96 F. App'x 778 (Securities v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Thompson
238 F. Supp. 3d 575 (S.D. New York, 2017)
Cobalt Multifamily Investors I, LLC v. Arden
857 F. Supp. 2d 349 (S.D. New York, 2011)