Securities & Exchange Commission v. Rex Venture Group, LLC

589 F. App'x 157
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 7, 2015·No. No. 14-1710·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Johnny Belsome, et al., appeal from the district court’s order clarifying a prior order and directing that any payments made by the Receiver be sent to a claimant’s home address rather than any third party, including attorneys. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order the Appellants seek to appeal is neither a final order nor an ap-pealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Rex Venture Group, LLC, 589 F. App'x 157 (4th Cir. 2015).

589 F. App'x 157 (Securities & Exchange Commission v. Rex Venture Group, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)