Securities and Exchange Commission v. Siliconsage Builders, LLC aka Silicon Sage Builders and Sanjeev Acharya

• Court: District Court, N.D. California
• Decided: January 22, 2026
• Docket: 3:20-cv-09247
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 RAINES FELDMAN LITTRELL LLP Kyra E. Andrassy, SBN 207959 2 kandrassy@raineslaw.com Michael L. Simon, SBN 300822 3 msimon@raineslaw.com 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 1550 4 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (310) 440-4100 5 Facsimile: (310) 691-1943

6 Counsel for David Stapleton, Receiver

7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 3:20-cv-09247-CRB COMMISSION, 12 Assigned to: Hon. Charles R. Breyer Plaintiff, 13 APPLICATION OF RATZLAFF v. TAMBERI & WONG ACCOUNTANCY 14 CORPORATION, TAX ACCOUNTANT SILICONSAGE BUILDERS, LLC aka FOR THE RECEIVER, FOR THE 15 SILICON SAGE BUILDERS and SANJEEV PERIOD FROM JANUARY 1, 2025, ACHARYA, THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2025; 16 DECLARATION OF CHRIS RATZLAFF Defendants. IN SUPPORT THEREOF :ORDER 17 Date: January 16, 2026 18 Time: 10:00 a.m. Ctrm: 6-17th Floor (Hearing by Zoom) 19 20 TO THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE, 21 THE SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, THE DEFENDANT AND HIS 22 COUNSEL, AND INVESTORS AND CREDITORS OF THE RECEIVERSHIP ENTITIES: 23 Ratzlaff Tamberi & Wong Accountancy Corporation (the "Firm"), tax accountants for 24 David Stapleton, the Receiver (the "Receiver"), submits its fee application for the period from 25 January 1, 2025, through September 30, 2025 (the "Application Period"), as required by the Order 26 on Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission's Motion for Appointment of Receiver (the 27 "Receivership Order"). Through this Application, the Firm seeks interim allowance of $7,364.50 1 in fees incurred in connection with the preparation of tax returns for certain of the entities under 2 receivership. The Firm seeks authorization for the Receiver to use funds on hand to pay 80% of 3 these fees, or $5,891.60, on an interim basis. 4 The Firm is informed that the SEC has no objection to the allowance or payment of the 5 fees and costs requested. 6 7 I. INTRODUCTION 8 This receivership involves SiliconSage Builders, LLC, and approximately sixty 9 subsidiaries and affiliates and eleven different real estate projects that were various stages of 10 completion when the Receiver was appointed. The Firm was retained in 2022 to prepare tax 11 returns for certain of the entities under receivership. During the Application Period, it prepared 12 returns for four of the entities for the year-ended December 31, 2024. The Firm incurred 13 $7,364.50 in fees in connection with tax return preparation during the Application Period and 14 seeks allowance of these fees on an interim basis and authorization for the Receiver to pay 80% of 15 the allowed fees at this time. 16 17 II. SERVICES RENDERED DURING THE APPLICATION PERIOD 18 During the Application Period, the Firm incurred $7,364.50 in fees in connection with the 19 preparation of federal and state returns for four of the entities that had activity in 2024. The 20 services performed by the Firm during the Application Period are described in the Firm's invoice, 21 which is attached hereto as Exhibit "1." 22 23 III. THE COURT HAS THE AUTHORITY AND DISCRETION TO APPROVE THE 24 REQUESTED INTERIM FEES AND EXPENSES. 25 Decisions regarding the timing and amount of an award of fees and expenses to the 26 Receiver and his professionals are committed to the sound discretion of the Court. See SEC v. 27 Elliot, 953 F.2d 1560, 1577 (11th Cir. 1992) (rev'd in part on other grounds, 998 F.2d 922 (11th 1 Court should consider the time records presented, the quality of the work performed, the 2 complexity of the problems faced, and the benefit of the services rendered to the Estate, along with 3 the Commission's position on the request, which is entitled to "great weight." SEC v. Fifth Ave. 4 Coach Lines, Inc., 364 F. Supp. 1220, 1222 (S.D.N.Y. 1973). 5 Where, as here, the fees requested are reasonable and "where both the magnitude and the 6 protracted nature of a case impose economic hardships on professionals rendering services to the 7 estate[,]" an interim award of fees is appropriate. Consumer Fin. Prot. Bureau v. Pension 8 Funding, LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 187607, at *4 (C.D. Cal. July 7, 2016). Interim allowances 9 are necessary "to relieve counsel and others from the burden of financing lengthy and complex [] 10 proceedings." In re Rose Way, Inc., 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 3028, at *9 (Bankr. S.D. Iowa Mar. 1, 11 1990) (citing In re Mansfield Tire & Rubber Co., 19 B.R. 125 (Bankr. N.D. Ohio 1981)). 12 Here, the Firm is assisting the Receiver with complying with his obligation to file tax 13 returns for certain of the entities. The Firm prepared and filed tax returns for four entities during 14 the Application Period. The billing statements of the Firm have been submitted to the SEC for 15 review prior to the filing of this Application, without objection. 16 17 IV. CONCLUSION 18 The Firm therefore respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order: 19 1. Allowing on an interim basis the Firm's fees for the Application Period totaling 20 $7,364.50; 21 2. Authorizing the Receiver to pay 80% of the fees, or $5,891.60, from funds on hand; 22 and 23 3. For such other and further relief the Court deems just and appropriate. 24 25 26 27 1 |} DATED: November 21, 2025 Respectfully submitted, 2 RAINES FELDMAN LITTRELL LLP 4 By: /s/ Kyra E. Andrassy 5 KYRA E. ANDRASSY ‘ aunsel for David Stapleton, Receiver Date: January 22, 2026 se DISTRI. Cyr 7 SS, £O ey & ED Ay DER 9 is so0* - < 10 a WIZ pr. Beever Jed 1 ONY ese Charis’ LS Lay x © 1 DistRICS 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28