Securities and Exchange Commission v. Patrick Jevon Johnson

• Court: District Court, C.D. California
• Decided: January 25, 2021
• Docket: 2:20-cv-08985
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case № 2:20-cv-8985-ODW (DFMx) COMMISSION, 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 Plaintiff, MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT FRANK EKEJIJA’S AFFIDAVIT 14 v. [39]; AND 15 GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 16 PATRICK JEVON JOHNSON, TO STRIKE AND/OR DISMISS CHARLES EVERETT (aka CHARLY DEFENDANT PATRICK JEVON 17 EVERETT), FRANK EKEJIJA, AND JOHNSON’S CROSS-CLAIMS [40] 18 NVC FUND, LLC

19 Defendants. 20 21 22 Before the Court are Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission’s Motion to 23 Strike Defendant Frank Ekejija’s Affidavit (ECF No. 39) and Motion to Strike and/or 24 Dismiss Defendant Patrick Jevon Johnson’s Cross-Claims (ECF No. 40). After 25 carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the motions, the Court deems 26 the matters appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); 27 C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing on the motions 28 on February 1, 2021. 1 Local Rule 7-9 requires an opposing party to file an opposition to a motion not 2 later than twenty-one days before the designated hearing date. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9. A 3 party that does not file an opposition may be deemed to consent to the granting of the 4 motion. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-12; see Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995) 5 (upholding district court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s complaint based on failure to oppose 6 motion as required by local rules). Before granting a motion, the court must weigh: 7 (1) the public interest in expeditious resolution of cases, (2) the court’s need to 8 manage its docket, (3) the risk of prejudice to defendants, (4) public policy favoring 9 disposition of cases on the merits, and (5) the availability of less drastic measures. Id. 10 at 53. A court is not required to consider these factors explicitly. Ismail v. Cnty. of 11 Orange, No. SACV 10-00901 VBF (AJW), 2012 WL 12964893, at *1 (C.D. Cal. 12 Nov. 7, 2012); accord Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 129 (9th Cir. 1987), 13 cert. denied, 488 U.S. 819 (1988)). In Ghazali, the Ninth Circuit found these factors 14 satisfied where the plaintiff received notice of the motion to dismiss and had “ample 15 opportunity to respond.” See Ghazali, 46 F.3d at 54. 16 Here, Plaintiff noticed the motions for hearing on February 1, 2021. Therefore, 17 Defendant Ekejija’s and Defendant Johnson’s opposition papers were due on 18 January 11, 2021. The time to oppose has expired and the Court has received no 19 oppositions from Defendant Ekejija or Defendant Johnson. Defendants received 20 notice of the motions and had opportunity to respond, but have failed to do so. 21 Accordingly, the Court deems Defendants’ failure to timely oppose as consent to 22 granting the motions. Further, the Court has considered the Ghazali factors 23 enumerated above and is convinced of the propriety of granting the motions. 24 Accordingly, pursuant to Local Rule 7-12 and Ghazali, the Court GRANTS 25 Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant Ekejija’s Affidavit (ECF No. 39) and 26 GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike and/or Dismiss Defendant Johnson’s 27 Cross-Claims (ECF No. 40). Defendant Johnson’s Cross-Claims are hereby 28 STRICKEN from the record. Defendant Frank Ekejija’s Affidavit is hereby 1 | STRICKEN from the record. Defendant Ekejija is ORDERED to file and serve an 2 || Answer that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Rule 8, by 3 || February 15, 2021. The Court must receive Defendant Ekejija’s responsive 4| pleading by this deadline for it to be timely. Failure to timely and adequately 5 || respond may subject Defendant Ekejija to default and/or default judgment, or other 6 || sanctions. 7 Defendants are advised that the Federal Pro Se Clinic offers free information 8 | and guidance to individuals who are representing themselves in federal civil actions. 9|| The Los Angeles Clinic operates by appointment only. You may schedule an 10 | appointment either by calling the Clinic or by using an internet portal. You can call 11 || the Clinic at (213) 385-2977, ext. 270, or you can submit an internet request at: 12 || http://prose.cacd.uscourts.gov/los-angeles or http://www.publiccounsel.org. Clinic 13 | staff can respond to many questions with a telephonic appointment or through your 14 || email account. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 January 25, 2021 19 ie oa 00 llisi OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23 24 25 26 27 28