Securities and Exchange Commission v. Life Partners, Incorporated and Brian D. Pardo

102 F.3d 587, 322 U.S. App. D.C. 189, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33222
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 20, 1996·No. 95-5364, 96-5018 and 96-5090·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinions

[588]*588ON APPELLEE’S PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before: WALD, GINSBURG, and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of appellee’s petition for rehearing, filed on August 19, 1996, and of the response thereto, it is ordered that the petition be denied.

A statement of Circuit Judge GINSBURG, joined by Circuit Judge HENDERSON, is attached.

A statement of Circuit Judge WALD dissenting from the denial of rehearing is also attached.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Life Partners, Incorporated and Brian D. Pardo, 102 F.3d 587, 322 U.S. App. D.C. 189, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33222 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

102 F.3d 587 (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Life Partners, Incorporated and Brian D. Pardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amerivest Financial, LLC v. Malouf
328 P.3d 739 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)
Wuliger v. Eberle
414 F. Supp. 2d 814 (N.D. Ohio, 2006)
Wuliger v. Christie
310 F. Supp. 2d 897 (N.D. Ohio, 2004)
Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America
2003 OK 90 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2003)
Joseph v. Viatica Management, LLC
55 P.3d 264 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2002)
Siporin v. Carrington
23 P.3d 92 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 2001)
Top of Iowa Cooperative v. Schewe
6 F. Supp. 2d 843 (N.D. Iowa, 1998)