Securities and Exchange Commission v. J. P. Howell & Company, Inc., and Michael Lamarca
This text of 330 F.2d 958 (Securities and Exchange Commission v. J. P. Howell & Company, Inc., and Michael Lamarca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
330 F.2d 958
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
v.
J. P. HOWELL & COMPANY, Inc., and Michael LaMarca, Appellants.
No. 14613.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued April 23, 1964.
Decided May 11, 1964.
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; James A. Coolahan, Judge.
Bernard J. Coven, New York City, for appellants.
Walter P. North, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C. (Philip A. Loomis, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Robert L. McCloskey, Atty., Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for plaintiff.
Before KALODNER, HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we cannot say that the District Court abused its discretion in entering 'Judgment of Permanent Injunction' and accordingly that Judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
330 F.2d 958, 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/securities-and-exchange-commission-v-j-p-howell-co-ca3-1964.