1 KARA HENDRICKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 07743 2 KYLE A. EWING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 014051 3 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 10845 Griffith Peak Drive Suite 600 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702) 938-6856 5 Facsimile: (702) 792-9002 hendricksk@gtlaw.com 6 KYRA E. ANDRASSY, ESQ. 7 Admitted Pro Hac Vice RAINES FELDMAN LITTRELL LLP 8 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 1550 Newport Beach, CA 92660 9 Telephone: (310) 440-4100 kandrassy@raineslaw.com 10 Attorneys for Receiver 11 Geoff Winkler of American Fiduciary Services
12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 2:21-cv-01298-JAD-BNW 15 COMMISSION,
16 Plaintiff, FINAL ORDER APPROVING RECEIVER’S SETTLEMENT WITH 17 v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
18 PROFIT CONNECT WEALTH SERVICES, Final Approval Hearing: INC., JOY I. KOVAR, and BRENT CARSON DATE: October 17, 2025 19 KOVAR, TIME: 10:00 a.m.
20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 This matter came before the Court for a duly noticed hearing on October 17, 2025, at 10:00 25 a.m. at the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas Division, 333 Las 26 Vegas Boulevard South, Courtroom 6D, Las Vegas, NV 89101 (the “Final Approval Hearing”), 27 upon the Motion to Approve Settlement with Bank of America, N.A. [ECF No. 237] (the “Motion”), by Geoff Winkler (the “Receiver”) as the court-appointed receiver of Profit Connect Wealth 1 Services, Inc. Due and adequate notice of the proposed Settlement Agreement with Bank of 2 America, N.A., having been provided, the Final Approval Hearing having been held before the 3 Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey with appearances as noted on the record, and the Court having 4 considered all papers filed, including any objections, and proceedings had herein and having heard 5 the arguments of counsel, and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause 6 appearing, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 7 The Motion seeks court approval of a proposed settlement (the “Settlement”) between the 8 Receiver and Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”). The terms of the Settlement are contained in the 9 Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit 1 to the 10 Declaration of Geoff Winkler submitted in support of the Motion. Capitalized terms not otherwise 11 defined in this order shall have the meaning assigned to them in the Settlement Agreement. The 12 Settlement Agreement is conditioned on the Court’s approval of the Settlement and entry of this 13 Final Approval Order. 14 On June 25, 2025, the Court entered a Preliminary Approval Order [ECF No. 242] that, 15 among other things, (i) preliminarily approved the Settlement, (ii) approved the form, content, and 16 manner of the notice to be provided to affected Receivership Claimants, and (iii) established the 17 schedule for approval of the Settlement and the Final Approval Hearing. The Receiver has filed a 18 declaration with the Court detailing his compliance with the notice and other requirements of the 19 Preliminary Approval Order [ECF No. 257]. 20 Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein and on the record, the Court enters this Final 21 Approval Order, finding that the terms of the Settlement are adequate, fair, and reasonable, and 22 APPROVES the Settlement. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 24 1. The Motion is GRANTED in its entirety. 25 2. Terms used in this Order are defined in the Settlement Agreement, unless expressly 26 otherwise defined in this Order. 27 3. The Court “has broad powers and wide discretion to determine the appropriate 1 injunctive relief, bar orders and other equitable remedies. See S.E.C. v. Capital Consultants, LLC, 2 397 F.3d 733, 738 (9th Cir. 2005); see In re Consol. Pinnacle W. Securities Litig./Resol. Tr. Corp.- 3 Merabank Litig., 51 F.3d 194, 197 (9th Cir. 1995). 4 4. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, and the Receiver 5 is the proper party to seek entry of this Order. 6 5. The Court finds that the methodology, form, content, and dissemination of the 7 Notice attached as Exhibit B to the Settlement Agreement: (i) were implemented in accordance 8 with the requirements of the Preliminary Approval Order; (ii) constituted the best practicable 9 notice; (iii) were reasonably calculated under the circumstances to apprise all Receivership 10 Claimants of the Settlement Agreement, the releases therein, and the provisions of this Order; (iv) 11 were reasonably calculated under the circumstances to apprise all interested parties of the right to 12 object to the Settlement Agreement and this Order, the right for Receivership Claimants to exclude 13 themselves from the Settlement, and to appear at the Final Approval Hearing; (v) were reasonable 14 and constituted due, adequate, and sufficient notice; (vi) met all applicable requirements of law, 15 including, without limitation, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution 16 (including Due Process), and the Rules of the Court; and (vii) provided to all Persons a full and 17 fair opportunity to be heard on these matters. 18 6. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement was reached following an extensive 19 investigation of the facts and resulted from vigorous, good faith, arm’s-length, mediated 20 negotiations involving experienced and competent counsel. The Parties have represented that 21 material components of the Settlement Agreement include: (a) the release of all claims arising out 22 of or related to the events leading to these proceedings that have been, could have been, or could 23 be asserted against BANA or against any of the other Releasees by the Receiver and Receivership 24 Claimants receiving a distribution from the Settlement Payment and (b) the bar order set forth in 25 paragraph 9 below. This Order is therefore necessary and appropriate to obtain relief for the 26 Receivership Estate and Receivership Claimants pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. 27 7. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, 1 or asserting a Claim against any BANA, including but not limited to the Receivership Claimants 2 and the Receiver. The Settlement Agreement is fully and finally approved. The Parties are directed 3 to implement and consummate the Settlement Agreement in accordance with the terms and 4 provisions of the Settlement Agreement and this Order. 5 8. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as of the Effective Date, and upon receipt 6 of the Settlement Payment by the Receiver, the Receiver and all Non-Optout Receivership 7 Claimants that receive a distribution from the net proceeds of the Settlement shall be deemed to 8 have fully, finally, and forever released BANA and the other Releasees from all claims relating to 9 Profit Connect or the Profit Connect Scheme, as fully set forth in Section 8 of the Settlement 10 Agreement, and shall be forever be barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, 11 prosecuting, maintaining, or seeking monetary or other relief respecting any and all of such claims 12 against BANA or against any other Releasees. 13 9.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 KARA HENDRICKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 07743 2 KYLE A. EWING, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 014051 3 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 10845 Griffith Peak Drive Suite 600 4 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702) 938-6856 5 Facsimile: (702) 792-9002 hendricksk@gtlaw.com 6 KYRA E. ANDRASSY, ESQ. 7 Admitted Pro Hac Vice RAINES FELDMAN LITTRELL LLP 8 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 1550 Newport Beach, CA 92660 9 Telephone: (310) 440-4100 kandrassy@raineslaw.com 10 Attorneys for Receiver 11 Geoff Winkler of American Fiduciary Services
12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 2:21-cv-01298-JAD-BNW 15 COMMISSION,
16 Plaintiff, FINAL ORDER APPROVING RECEIVER’S SETTLEMENT WITH 17 v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
18 PROFIT CONNECT WEALTH SERVICES, Final Approval Hearing: INC., JOY I. KOVAR, and BRENT CARSON DATE: October 17, 2025 19 KOVAR, TIME: 10:00 a.m.
20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 This matter came before the Court for a duly noticed hearing on October 17, 2025, at 10:00 25 a.m. at the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas Division, 333 Las 26 Vegas Boulevard South, Courtroom 6D, Las Vegas, NV 89101 (the “Final Approval Hearing”), 27 upon the Motion to Approve Settlement with Bank of America, N.A. [ECF No. 237] (the “Motion”), by Geoff Winkler (the “Receiver”) as the court-appointed receiver of Profit Connect Wealth 1 Services, Inc. Due and adequate notice of the proposed Settlement Agreement with Bank of 2 America, N.A., having been provided, the Final Approval Hearing having been held before the 3 Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey with appearances as noted on the record, and the Court having 4 considered all papers filed, including any objections, and proceedings had herein and having heard 5 the arguments of counsel, and otherwise being fully informed in the premises and good cause 6 appearing, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 7 The Motion seeks court approval of a proposed settlement (the “Settlement”) between the 8 Receiver and Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”). The terms of the Settlement are contained in the 9 Settlement Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit 1 to the 10 Declaration of Geoff Winkler submitted in support of the Motion. Capitalized terms not otherwise 11 defined in this order shall have the meaning assigned to them in the Settlement Agreement. The 12 Settlement Agreement is conditioned on the Court’s approval of the Settlement and entry of this 13 Final Approval Order. 14 On June 25, 2025, the Court entered a Preliminary Approval Order [ECF No. 242] that, 15 among other things, (i) preliminarily approved the Settlement, (ii) approved the form, content, and 16 manner of the notice to be provided to affected Receivership Claimants, and (iii) established the 17 schedule for approval of the Settlement and the Final Approval Hearing. The Receiver has filed a 18 declaration with the Court detailing his compliance with the notice and other requirements of the 19 Preliminary Approval Order [ECF No. 257]. 20 Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein and on the record, the Court enters this Final 21 Approval Order, finding that the terms of the Settlement are adequate, fair, and reasonable, and 22 APPROVES the Settlement. 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 24 1. The Motion is GRANTED in its entirety. 25 2. Terms used in this Order are defined in the Settlement Agreement, unless expressly 26 otherwise defined in this Order. 27 3. The Court “has broad powers and wide discretion to determine the appropriate 1 injunctive relief, bar orders and other equitable remedies. See S.E.C. v. Capital Consultants, LLC, 2 397 F.3d 733, 738 (9th Cir. 2005); see In re Consol. Pinnacle W. Securities Litig./Resol. Tr. Corp.- 3 Merabank Litig., 51 F.3d 194, 197 (9th Cir. 1995). 4 4. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, and the Receiver 5 is the proper party to seek entry of this Order. 6 5. The Court finds that the methodology, form, content, and dissemination of the 7 Notice attached as Exhibit B to the Settlement Agreement: (i) were implemented in accordance 8 with the requirements of the Preliminary Approval Order; (ii) constituted the best practicable 9 notice; (iii) were reasonably calculated under the circumstances to apprise all Receivership 10 Claimants of the Settlement Agreement, the releases therein, and the provisions of this Order; (iv) 11 were reasonably calculated under the circumstances to apprise all interested parties of the right to 12 object to the Settlement Agreement and this Order, the right for Receivership Claimants to exclude 13 themselves from the Settlement, and to appear at the Final Approval Hearing; (v) were reasonable 14 and constituted due, adequate, and sufficient notice; (vi) met all applicable requirements of law, 15 including, without limitation, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution 16 (including Due Process), and the Rules of the Court; and (vii) provided to all Persons a full and 17 fair opportunity to be heard on these matters. 18 6. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement was reached following an extensive 19 investigation of the facts and resulted from vigorous, good faith, arm’s-length, mediated 20 negotiations involving experienced and competent counsel. The Parties have represented that 21 material components of the Settlement Agreement include: (a) the release of all claims arising out 22 of or related to the events leading to these proceedings that have been, could have been, or could 23 be asserted against BANA or against any of the other Releasees by the Receiver and Receivership 24 Claimants receiving a distribution from the Settlement Payment and (b) the bar order set forth in 25 paragraph 9 below. This Order is therefore necessary and appropriate to obtain relief for the 26 Receivership Estate and Receivership Claimants pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. 27 7. The Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable, 1 or asserting a Claim against any BANA, including but not limited to the Receivership Claimants 2 and the Receiver. The Settlement Agreement is fully and finally approved. The Parties are directed 3 to implement and consummate the Settlement Agreement in accordance with the terms and 4 provisions of the Settlement Agreement and this Order. 5 8. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as of the Effective Date, and upon receipt 6 of the Settlement Payment by the Receiver, the Receiver and all Non-Optout Receivership 7 Claimants that receive a distribution from the net proceeds of the Settlement shall be deemed to 8 have fully, finally, and forever released BANA and the other Releasees from all claims relating to 9 Profit Connect or the Profit Connect Scheme, as fully set forth in Section 8 of the Settlement 10 Agreement, and shall be forever be barred and enjoined from commencing, instituting, 11 prosecuting, maintaining, or seeking monetary or other relief respecting any and all of such claims 12 against BANA or against any other Releasees. 13 9. The Court permanently bars, restrains, and enjoins each of the Non-Optout 14 Receivership Claimants that receive a distribution from the net proceeds of the Settlement, whether 15 acting in concert with the foregoing or claiming by, through, or under the foregoing, or otherwise, 16 all and individually, from directly, indirectly, or through a third party, prosecuting, against BANA 17 or against any other Releasees, now or at any time in the future, any action, lawsuit, cause of action, 18 claim, investigation, demand, complaint, or proceeding of any nature in any state or federal court, 19 arbitration proceeding, or other forum in the United States, whether individually, derivatively, on 20 behalf of a class, as a member of a class, or in any other capacity whatsoever, that in any way 21 relates to, is based upon, arises from, or is connected with the claims and matters released in 22 Section 8 of the Settlement Agreement. Nothing in the foregoing shall preclude any Non-Optout 23 Receivership Claimant from cooperating with governmental authorities in a lawful manner or 24 responding to a valid subpoena. 25 10. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Final Approval Order or the 26 Settlement Agreement, the foregoing releases and bar do not release the Parties’ rights and 27 obligations under the Settlement Agreement or preclude the Parties from seeking to enforce or 1 11. Nothing in this Final Approval Order or the Settlement Agreement and no aspect 2 of the Settlement Agreement or negotiation thereof is or shall be construed to be an admission or 3 concession of any violation of any statute or law, of any fault, liability or wrongdoing, or of any 4 infirmity in the claims or defenses of the Parties with regard to any of the complaints, claims, 5 allegations or defenses in any proceeding. 6 12. BANA is ordered to pay or cause to be paid the Settlement Payment 7 ($1,825,000.00) as described in the Settlement Agreement. The Receiver is directed to make 8 distributions using the net proceeds of the Settlement Payment to the Non-Optout Receivership 9 Claimants with allowed claims pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting Motion for Order in Aid of 10 Receivership Allowing and Disallowing Claims [ECF Nos. 181, 191]. The Receiver is authorized 11 to pay from the Settlement Payment the total sum of three hundred sixty-five thousand dollars 12 ($365,000.00) to his special litigation counsel Levine Kellogg Lehman Schneider + Grossman 13 LLP, which sum constitutes a 20% contingency fee voluntarily reduced from the Court-approved 14 25% fee. [ECF Nos. 142, 147]. The Parties are ordered to act in conformity with all other 15 provisions of the Settlement Agreement. 16 13. The terms of the Settlement Agreement and of this Final Approval Order shall be 17 binding on the Receiver, Profit Connect, the Non-Optout Receivership Claimants, and BANA, as 18 well as their respective successors and assigns. 19 14. The Court finds and determines, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), 20 that there is no just reason for any delay in the entry of this Final Approval Order, which is both 21 final and appealable as a final judgment of the Court, and immediate entry by the Clerk of the 22 Court is so ordered. 23 15. Without in any way affecting the finality of this Order, the Court retains continuing 24 jurisdiction over the Parties for purposes of, among other things, the administration, interpretation, 25 consummation, and enforcement of this Final Approval Order and the Settlement Agreement, 26 including, without limitation, the injunctions and releases herein, and to enter orders concerning 27 the distribution of the Settlement Payment. 1 16. The Receiver shall cause this Final Approval Order to be served via e-mail or first- 2|| class U.S. mail on all known Receivership Claimants. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: 10/17/25 6 ~ os
JENNIFER A>DORSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28