Securities and Exchange Commission v. Genovese
Opinion
sie ~\ fF ab pt 17079104 - GENOVESE, NICHOLAS JOSEPH - Unit: BRO-{-C -\(5 (f. [5 \| WIE □□ USDC SDNY vervevssssseect □□□□□ 17079104 j DOCUMENT 162020 □ □ | ELECTRONICALLY FILED Willow Creek Investments LP,Willow Creek Advisors |] DOC #: woe 07/13/2020 06:49:33 PM | DATE FILED: 7/22/20 OFFICE
LEGAL MAIL July, 13, 2020
Hon. Barbara Moses States Magistrate Judge States Courthouse Pearl Street Room 200 NY 10007-1312 J. Genovese 17079104 Detention Center Brooklyn 329002 NY 11232 v. Nicholas J. Genovese, et.al., 18-CV-942 (JGK} (BCM) Judge Moses: J. Genovese, who is representing m\himself Pro Se, in the above entitled matter is also representing Willow Creek stments LP and Willow Creek Advisors, LLC. | am the sole owner of both entities. 6/20/20 | would fike to make clear that | am representing Willow Creek Investments LP and Willow Creek Advisors, LLC myself Pro Se. Z 5 a □□
Genovese, Creek Investments LP Creek Advisors, LLC The Complaint alleges that Willow Creek Investments LP is a Delaware limited partnership and that Willow Creek Advisors, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company. LPs and LLCs, even if wholly-owned, must appear in this Court through a licensed attorney. Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2007). Mr. Genovese, who is not an attorney, may represent himself but may not represent the entity defendants. The Court sua sponte extends the parties’ deadline for filing their Rule 26(f) report to August 24, 2020. Mr. Genovese is advised that Rule 26(f) requires the parties to (a) jointly confer to develop a proposed discovery plan and (b) submit a joint written report outlining the plan. Mr. Genovese's letter at Dkt. No. 33, which the Court construes as an application for an order compelling the production of evidence in a certain form, is DENIED without prejudice to renewal after the Rule 26(f) report is submitted. SO ORDERED. abo ARR Barbara Moses, U.S.M.J. July 22, 2020
cag □□□ + & □□ ne he ¢ □□□ OP) nk es 4 pe of □□ aw =a Coot \ Sern ON ‘ cn | an □□ □□ OS arm as gs □ pm : □□□□ EN CON gk) Re GF, SO . oo |) fmt = ce “he, a a le = Wiles □□ =e yale co = oe & S is 2S wef 3 O 8B Bw □□ Se \ a =, Pa ; be ~~ . Pm, \ ae ct Wim □□ Sol "ta 5 =e econ oC □□□ pos CS Veer Dg 4 □ 5 (Ly = □□ pee te oat ai we i C- WO] Xo ae oo tA & Bo DR oe ney ii} □□ “ey iy ue ao re me □ OMS Bis yl
“UR we = pe ET eS = CO oF □□ i x on wn □□ a : 5 +- □ 7 ae □□ = □□□ Be
a rm □□□□□
= ew □□□□ EF =. ge A ma a □ □□□ = ae, : ae i { □ □□□ “Pie. ag bee □ i.
□□ re os
□□□ □□ □□□
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Genovese (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Genovese) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.