Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frank Igwealor, Patience Ogbozor, Alpharidge Capital, LLC, American Community Capital, LP, GiveMePower, Inc., Kid Castle Educational

District Court, C.D. California·Decided December 18, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-09941·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SECURITIES AND Case No. 2:24-cv-09941-SRM-PDx EXCHANGE COMMISSION, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff, (PD Version) vs. Check if submitted without ☐ FRANK IGWEALOR, PATIENCE material modifications to PD form

CAPITAL, LLC, AMERICAN COMMUNITY CAPITAL, LP, CASTLE EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION, LOS ANGELES VIDEO RIVER NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendants.

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this Action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT The parties have conferred in good faith and jointly acknowledge that discoverable material in this case includes non-public, sensitive personal information, such that there is good cause supporting the entry of this Stipulated Protective Order. In particular, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) expects to produce its investigative file related to this Action, which includes the production of documents from Non-Parties. These documents may include personally sensitive information, including social security number or taxpayer identification number (other than only the last four digits thereof), an individual’s birth date (other than only the year of the individual’s birth), the name of an individual known to be a minor (other than only the minor’s initials), or a financial account number (other than only last four digits thereof), and home addresses. In addition, some of the documents produced by non-parties were produced to the SEC bearing language requesting confidentiality. The parties submit that good cause exists to treat as confidential such private information, and therefore seek a Stipulated Protective Order that is not unlimited in scope. See Oliner v. Kontrabecki, 745 F.3d 1024, 1026 (9th Cir. 2014). 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: This pending litigation involves allegations by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission” or “SEC”) that Defendant Frank Igwealor, either with or in conjunction with other Defendants, engaged in a scheme to 1) obtain control of publicly-traded penny stock companies; 2) misappropriate funds from one such company for the purchase of his private home; and 3) enrich himself further through unlawful sales of stock in some of those companies. 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this Action. 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial will be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order will remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition will be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on o

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frank Igwealor, Patience Ogbozor, Alpharidge Capital, LLC, American Community Capital, LP, GiveMePower, Inc., Kid Castle Educational, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frank Igwealor, Patience Ogbozor, Alpharidge Capital, LLC, American Community Capital, LP, GiveMePower, Inc., Kid Castle Educational (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Frank Igwealor, Patience Ogbozor, Alpharidge Capital, LLC, American Community Capital, LP, GiveMePower, Inc., Kid Castle Educational) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aron Oliner v. John Kontrabecki
745 F.3d 1024 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)