Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brian Lam

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedMarch 11, 2025
Docket2:22-cv-06831
StatusUnknown

This text of Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brian Lam (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brian Lam) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brian Lam, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

2 3 4 5

7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Western Division 11 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No. 2:22-cv-06831-WLH-E 12 COMMISSION, FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO 13 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT NATHAN NHAN NGUYEN 14 v.

15 BRIAN LAM; NINESQUARE 16 CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC; NATHAN NHAN NGUYEN; and 17 NGUYEN GROUP LLC, 18 Defendants, 19 and 20 YI PING LU; and THY STACY 21 NGUYEN

22 Relief Defendants. 23

24 25 26 27 1 WHEREAS, on March 21, 2023 the Court entered a bifurcated consent 2 judgment against Defendant Nathan Nhan Nguyen (“Defendant”) (Dkt No. 33), 3 ordering, among other relief which is replicated below, that upon motion of the 4 Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) Defendant shall pay 5 disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest thereon, and a civil penalty 6 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 7 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 8 “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)], and the Court having now considered the 9 SEC’s Partially Unopposed Motion for Monetary Relief Against Defendants and 10 Relief Defendants, the supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities, the 11 supporting declarations and exhibits, and the other evidence and argument presented 12 to the Court, finds that: 13 I. 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is 15 permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act of 16 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence 17 of any applicable exemption: 18 (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of 19 any means or instruments of transportation or communication in 20 interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use 21 or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; 22 (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or 23 causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any 24 means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose 25 of sale or for delivery after sale; or 26 (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or 27 communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or 1 any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the 2 Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the 3 subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of 4 the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under 5 Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 7 provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also 8 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal 9 service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and 10 attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or 11 with anyone described in (a). 12 II. 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is 14 permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 15 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 16 78o(a)], by making use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate 17 commerce to effect any transactions in, or to induce or attempt to induce the purchase 18 or sale of, any security (other than an exempted security or commercial paper, 19 bankers’ acceptances, or commercial bills) without being associated with a broker or 20 dealer that is registered in accordance with Section 15(b) of the Exchange Act. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 22 provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also 23 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal 24 service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and 25 attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or 26 with anyone described in (a). 27 1 III. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to 3 Section 21(d)(5) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5)], Defendant is 4 permanently restrained and enjoined from directly or indirectly, including but not 5 limited to, through any entity owned or controlled by him, participating in the 6 issuance, purchase, offer, or sale of any security in an unregistered offering. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 8 provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also 9 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal 10 service or otherwise: (a) Defendant’s officers, agents, servants, employees, and 11 attorneys; and (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendant or 12 with anyone described in (a). 13 IV. 14 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 15 Defendant is liable for $0 in disgorgement, as determined by the Commission’s 16 Motion, based on Defendant Nguyen’s repayment of illicit funds. Defendant is 17 liable, however, for a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000, with Defendant Nguyen 18 Group LLC liable for $25,000 in civil penalties, pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the 19 Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)] and Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 20 U.S.C. § 77t(d)].1 Defendant shall satisfy this obligation by paying $1,000 to the 21 22

23 1 The SEC initially sought civil penalty amounts of $11,524 from Defendant Nguyen 24 and $115,231 from Defendant Nguyen Group LLC. (Mot. for Monetary Relief, Docket No. 52 at 12). Based, however, on Defendant Nguyen’s uncontested 25 representation that he has spent upwards of $200,000 towards making victims whole 26 in the last two years, the Court, in its discretion, reduced these amounts. See S.E.C. v. RMR Asset Mgmt. Co., 553 F.Supp.3d 820, 828 (S.D. Cal. 2021) (exercising judicial 27 discretion to reduce civil penalties). The civil penalty amount, however, is not $0, in 1 Securities and Exchange Commission within 30 days after entry of this Final 2 Judgment. 3 Defendant may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which will 4 provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment may also 5 be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC website at 6 http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Exceptions to discharge
11 U.S.C. § 523
Judgments
15 U.S.C. § 16
Investigations and actions
15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)
§ 77t
20 U.S.C. § 77t(d)
Interest
28 U.S.C. § 1961
Applicability of chapter
28 U.S.C. § 3001
§ 77t
7 U.S.C. § 77t(d)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Brian Lam, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/securities-and-exchange-commission-v-brian-lam-cacd-2025.