Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley
This text of Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 || Lance A. Maningo MANINGO LAW 2||Nevada Bar No. 6405 3 ||400 South 4" Street, Suite 650 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 4||702.626.4646 lance@maningolaw.com 5||Attomey for Defendants SEYBERT and 6 ROCKING HORSE PROPERTIES, LLC 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 10 Plaintiff STIPULATION AND ORDER 11|Iv. UNFREEZING CERTAIN ASSETS AND BANK ACCOUNTS OF DENNY 12|| MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY, et. al., SEYBERT AND ROCKING HORSE
3 : B Defendants PROPERTIES, LLC OF) 2s 3 14/\THE JUDD IRREVOCABLE TRUST, etal., [ECF No. 818]
4% ¢ 5 15 Relief Defendants
16 BA 17 18 This stipulation and order unfreezing all assets and all bank accounts of Denny 19|| Seybert (“Seybert”) and Rocking Horse Properties, LLC (“Rocking Horse”) is made by and 20|| between Geoff Winkler, the Court-appointed receiver (the “Receiver”), the Securities and 21]| Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), Seybert, and Rocking Horse, by and through all 22] respective legal counsel. 23 >A WHEREAS, on April 12, 2022, Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchang 5 Commission (“SEC”, “Commission”, or “‘Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint in this matter, allegin %6 violations of the registration and/or antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws by 27 28
1|| Defendants, and the receipt of ill-gotten proceeds of such violations by Relief Defendants. 2|| (ECE No. 1.) 3 WHEREAS, on April 13, 2022, the Commission filed an Ex Parte Application for 4|| Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order and other equitable relief as to Defendants and an 5|| asset freeze as to Defendants and Relief Defendants (ECF No. 2), which was granted by the 6}| Court on April 13, 2022. (ECF No. 3.) 7 WHEREAS, on April 21, 2022, the Court issued its Order Entering Preliminary 8|| Injunction, Asset Freeze, and other Equitable Relief as to Defendants and Relief Defendants, 91] which, inter alia, continued the asset freeze imposed by the Court on April 13, 2022. (ECF 10]| No. 56.) The Court’s Order provided that “any allowance for necessary and reasonable living 11]]| expenses will be granted only upon good cause shown by application to the Court with notice
12}| and an opportunity for the Commission to be heard.” § 13 WHEREAS, on or about May 4, 2022, the Commission and Seybert/Rocking Horse 14]| reached agreement as to an allowance for living expenses up to and including September 30, a 2022, and jointly submitted a stipulation, which was approved by this Court. (ECF No. 71.) 16 WHEREAS, on or about June 3, 2022, the Receiver was appointed by order of th 17|| Court (ECF No. 88) which was amended on July 28, 2022 (ECF No. 207) (collectively tk 18]] “Appointment Order’). 19 WHEREAS, the Receiver has received the total sum of $560,323.35 (“Deposit”) from 20]| Seybert and Rocking Horse as a good faith deposit toward any financial liability resulting from 21}] this matter. 22 WHEREAS, the Receiver filed a lis pendens on Seybert’s property located at 1098 23|| Lake Pointe Drive, Bigfork, MT 59911 believed to have equity estimated at or above eight 24|) hundred thousand ($800,000) dollars and Seybert agreed to maintain and not sell the property 25|| pending a resolution of this matter. 26 WHEREAS, the Receiver has undertaken a detailed forensic accounting analysis of 27|| 179 accounts belonging to the 16 named defendants and/or the 75 entities through which they 28
1}| collectively conducted the affairs of the alleged Ponzi scheme at the heart of this litigation. See, 2|| ECF No. 792. The 179 accounts were identified after the review and analysis of a total of 716 3]|| bank accounts that had investor flows, transfers between defendants, and/or internal transfers 4]| related to the alleged Ponzi scheme. 5 WHEREAS, based on the Receiver’s forensic accounting, Seybert raised $8.8 million 6|| from 54 investors (“Seybert Investors”) of which $5.2 million went directly through his 7|| business and personal accounts. The forensic accounting indicates Seybert received $1.4 8}| million from related defendants, paid $3.8 million to mvestors, and personally benefitted by 9}| $355,000 as a result of the alleged Ponzi scheme. 10 WHEREAS, the Receiver believes that the Seybert Investors will have $5.6 million : 11}| allowed claims and that there is $192,875 potentially recoverable from Seybert Investors thé 12]| the Receiver has classified as net winners. § 13 WHEREAS, Seybert has agreed to continue to cooperate and work with the Receiver 14|| to assist the Receiver in recovering the $192,875 from the Seybert Investors that the Receiver 2 a 15]| classified as net winners, with such funds to be utilized by the Receiver for the benefit of the 3 16|| creditors of the Receivership Estate. - 17 WHEREAS, the Commission believes, based on available information, that the total 18]|| remaining estimated disgorgement, preyudgment interest, and civil penalties (over and above 19]| the Deposit) that the Commission will seek in this action from Seybert and Rocking Horse is 20|| less than $15,000. 21 WHEREAS, the Commission and Seybert have reached a bifurcated settlement 22|| pursuant to which Seybert consents to judgment on lability, without admitting or denying the 23}| allegations, with the issues of disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties reserved 24|| for later determination (Dkt. No. 817). 25 WHEREAS, the parties hereto agree that nothing herein limits the Receiver’s duties 26|| and obligations under the Appointment Order nor does this stipulation restrict or preclude the 27|| Receiver from taking additional action relating to or against Seybert should additional information become available.
1 WHEREFORE, based on the forgoing the Commission, the Receiver, and Seybert/ 2|| Rocking Horse have reached agreement: 1) that $15,000 will remain in the trust account 3|| (OLTA) of Maningo Law and remain there until this matter is resolved, 2) that all assets and 4|| bank accounts of Seybert and/or Rocking Horse will be unfrozen, and 3) that the Receiver will 5|| release the lis pendens on Seybert’s property located at 1098 Lake Pointe Drive, Bigfork, MT 6|| 59911. 9||Dated this 9th day of July 2025 Dated this 9th day of July 2025 10 MANINGO LAW GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 11
121! By:/s/ Lance A. Maningo By: /s/ Kara B. Hendricks B LANCE A. MANINGO, Bar No. 6405 KARA B. HENDRICKS, Bar No. 077 3 5 § Attorney for Defendant Sevbert and KYLE A. EWING, Bar No. 014051 2s 14 Rocking Horse Attorney for Receiver Geoff Winkler § 5
15/|Dated this 9th day of July 2025
24 16 SECURITIES & EXCHANGE = 17||COMMISSION 18 19 By:/s/ Pat Huddleston PAT HUDDLESTON, ESQ. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 BASED ON THE FORGOING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 a. $15,000 will remain in the trust account (IOLTA) of Maningo Law (to remain 3}| until this matter is resolved); 4 b. all assets and bank accounts of Denny Seybert and Rocking Horse Properties, 5|| LLC be unfrozen; and 6 c. that lis pendens on Seybert’s property located at 1098 Lake Pointe Drive, 7|| Bigfork, MT 59911 be released. } 8 Dated: July 9, 2025 9 ; 10 H ristina D. Silva Wl States District Court
432 224 1
1 16 SH = 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/securities-and-exchange-commission-v-beasley-nvd-2025.