Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 17, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-00612·Unknown

Opinion

JUAnSitOedN S Mtat.e Fs RAItEtoRrnSeOyN Nevada Bar No. 7709 DANIEL D. HOLLINGSWORTH Assistant United States Attorney Nevada Bar No. 1925 501 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6336 Daniel.Hollingsworth@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 2:22-CV-612-CDS-EJY COMMISSION, Stipulation to Turnover the Seized Plaintiff Property to the SEC Receiver as to Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd, d.b.a. J&J v. Consulting Services, Inc., Alaska; J&J Consulting Services, Inc., Nevada; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, and Order MATTHEW WADE BEASLEY et al. Defendants THE JUDD IRREVOCABLE TRUST et al. Relief Defendants Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc., Alaska; J&J Consulting Services, Inc., Nevada (both now listed as J&J Consulting Services, Inc.); and J and J Purchasing, LLC., agree as follows: 1. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree the government will dismiss the forfeiture case (case) in order to turnover the seized property to the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) Receiver to be credited to Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd, J&J Consulting Services, Inc. and J&J Purchasing, Inc., as payment toward any future disgorgement in Securities Exchange Commission vs. Beasley et al., Case No. 2:22-CV-00612- 2. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to waive their right to any administrative forfeiture, civil judicial forfeiture, or criminal forfeiture proceedings (proceedings) concerning the forfeiture of the following seized property: a. PATEK PHILIPPE GENEVE WATCH IN BOX S/N A384EBA, b. HUBLOT WATCH S/N 1509142, c. ONE SILVER COLORED RING WITH CLEAR STONES, d. FRANCK MULLER VANGUARD WATCH S/N TT BR ER, e. ONE PAIR EARRINGS, SILVER IN COLOR IN BOX, f. ONE NECKLACE, SILVER IN COLOR IN BOX, g. ONE SILVER COLORED BRACELET WITH CLEAR STONES IN h. ONE SILVER COLORED NECKLACE WITH CLEAR STONES IN i. TWO BERGER AND SON RINGS, j. ONE SILVER COLORED HEART NECKLACE IN BERGER AND k. ONE SILVER COLORED RING WITH CLEAR STONES IN l. ONE PAIR TIFFANY AND CO EARRINGS IN BOX, m. ONE TIFFANY AND CO BRACELET IN BOX, n. ONE SILVER COLORED RING IN RED BOX, o. ONE ROLEX WATCH-SILVER, p. ONE HUBLOT WATCH WITH DARK LEATHER BAND, q. ONE GORILLA WATCH-WHITE AND BLACK, r. ONE RICHARD MILLE WITH BLACK BAND, s. ONE CARTIER WATCH SILVER S/N 245911AX, t. 1,500 SILVER COINS IN CONTAINERS, u. 126 GOLD COINS OF VARIOUS SHAPES AND SIZES, v. 220 SILVER COINS, w. 2 SILVER PLATES, x. 140 SILVER COINS IN VARIOUS SIZES, y. 60 (3 TUBES) SILVER COINS, z. 15 INDIVIDUAL SILVER COINS, aa. 5 SILVER PLATES IN “ACID” BOX, bb. 244 SILVER COINS, cc. 1 GOLD COIN IN “JOHN VARVATOS” BOX, and dd. US $397,171 (all of which constitutes seized property). 3. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to waive service of process of any documents filed in the case or any proceedings concerning the seized property arising from the facts and circumstances of the case. 4. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to waive any further notice to them, their agents, or their attorneys regarding the forfeiture, disposition, and turnover of the seized property. 5. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree not to file any claim, answer, petition, or other documents in any proceedings concerning the seized property. 6. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree not to contest, and agree not to assist any other person and entity to contest, the forfeiture in any proceedings concerning the seized property. 7. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to withdraw any claims, answers, counterclaims, petitions, or other documents they filed in any proceedings concerning the seized property, including, but not limited to, the administrative forfeiture and the administrative claims. 8. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to waive the statute of limitations, the CAFRA requirements, Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions A, C, E, and G, 18 U.S.C. § 983, any and all constitutional, statutory, legal, equitable rights, defenses, and claims regarding the property, including, but not limited to, double jeopardy and due process under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution in any proceedings concerning the seized property. 9. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to waive all constitutional, statutory, legal, equitable rights, defenses, and claims regarding the property, including, but not limited to, a jury trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution in any proceedings concerning the seized property. 10. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to waive any and all constitutional, statutory, legal, equitable rights, defenses, and claims regarding the property, including, but not limited to, excessive fines and cruel and unusual punishments under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution in any proceedings concerning the seized property. 11. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to waive any and all constitutional, statutory, legal, equitable rights, defenses, and claims to the property under Honeycutt v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1626 (2017); United States v. Thompson, 990 F.3d 680 (9th Cir. 2021); and United States v. Prasad, 18 F.4th 313, 315, 319 (9th Cir. 2021) in any proceedings concerning the seized property. / / / 12. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to the entry of this Order to dismiss the case and to turnover the seized property. 13. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to waive the right to appeal any Order to dismiss the case and to turnover the seized property to the SEC Receiver. 14. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to the conditions set forth in this Stipulation to Turnover the Seized Property to the SEC Receiver as to Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd, d.b.a. J&J Consulting Services, Inc., Alaska; J&J Consulting Services, Inc., Nevada; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, and Order (Stipulation). 15. Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, knowingly and voluntarily agree to hold harmless the United States, the United States Department of Justice, the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the United States Marshals Service, the Department of the United States Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission, their agencies, their agents, and their employees from any claim made by Jennifer Judd; Jeffrey J. Judd; J&J Consulting Services, Inc.; and J and J Purchasing, LLC, o

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley, (D. Nev. 2023).

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Beasley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Honeycutt v. United States
581 U.S. 443 (Supreme Court, 2017)
United States v. Vassily Thompson
990 F.3d 680 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)
United States v. Abhijit Prasad
18 F.4th 313 (Ninth Circuit, 2021)