Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arkansas Loan and Thrift Corporation

427 F.2d 1171, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8832
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 1970
Docket19735
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 427 F.2d 1171 (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arkansas Loan and Thrift Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arkansas Loan and Thrift Corporation, 427 F.2d 1171, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8832 (8th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment and order authorizing the equity receiver of Arkansas Loan and Thrift Corporation (A. L. & T.), United Loan and Investment Company and Savings Guaranty Corporation (Savings) to settle a claim against Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, the fidelity bond carrier of A. L. & T. and Savings. The facts involved in this dispute are reported at 297 F.Supp. 73 and need not be discussed here. 1

The appellants claim that the trial court incorrectly interpreted the fidelity bond involved in this case, and therefore erred in approving the settlement.

*1172 Any action by a trial court in supervising an equity receiver is committed to his sound discretion and will not be disturbed unless there is a clear showing of abuse. In re Albert Harris, Inc., 6 Cir., 313 F.2d 447, 449; In re California Associated Products Co., 9 Cir., 183 F.2d 946, 949; MacDonald v. Aetna Indemnity Co., 88 Conn. 571, 92 A. 154, 157; Gordon v. Hartford Sterling Co., 319 Pa. 174, 179 A. 234, 237-238. Under this rule, we need not pass on the merits of the trial court’s interpretation of the bond beyond a finding that there has been no abuse of discretion. We have reviewed the record in this case and find. no abuse of discretion in the approval of the receiver’s settlement.

The judgment of the trial court approving the settlement is affirmed.

1

. For further discussion of this receivership, see 294 F.Supp. 1233, aff’d, 422 F.2d 475.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C.
70 F.4th 482 (Eighth Circuit, 2023)
John W. Bendall, Jr. v. Lancer Management Group, LLC
523 F. App'x 554 (Eleventh Circuit, 2013)
Kinzer v. Fidelity and Deposit Co. of Maryland
652 N.E.2d 20 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1995)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Elliott
953 F.2d 1560 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)
Western Bank v. Fluid Assets Development Corp.
806 P.2d 1048 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1991)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hardy
803 F.2d 1034 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Robert Hardy
803 F.2d 1034 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)
Bankers Life Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
366 N.W.2d 166 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1985)
Booker Bros. v. American Casualty Co.
57 Pa. D. & C.2d 353 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 F.2d 1171, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 8832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/securities-and-exchange-commission-v-arkansas-loan-and-thrift-corporation-ca8-1970.