Securities and Exch v. Herula
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 02-1640
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
MARTIN D. FIFE AND FAROUK KHAN,
Defendants, Appellants.
DENNIS S. HERULA, MARY LEE CAPALBO (AKA MARY LEE CAPALBO HERULA), SEAVIEW DEVELOPMENT & HOLDINGS, LTD., MICHAEL CLARKE, ROBERT WACHTEL, JOHAN HERTZOG, and CHARLES SULLIVAN,
Defendants,
and
DAVID ULLOM,
Relief-Defendant.
ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court issued on November 6, 2002 is amended as follows:
The second sentence of the second full paragraph on page 8 is amended to read:
Unlike the Second Circuit, we have not removed irreparable harm from the preliminary injunction inquiry in SEC preliminary injunction actions. SEC v. World Radio Mission, 544 F.2d 535, 541- 42 (1st Cir. 1976) (reversing the district court's finding that the denial of injunctive relief will not cause any harm to the public, irreparable or otherwise); see also SEC v. Lehman Bros., Inc., 157 F.3d 2, 9 (1st Cir. 1998) (finding that there was no obvious harm in allowing appellant lienholder to maintain the escrow allegedly secured by debtor through unlawful insider trading).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
311 F.3d 1 (Securities and Exch v. Herula) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.