Securities and Exch v. Herula

311 F.3d 1
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 2003
Docket02-1640
StatusPublished

This text of 311 F.3d 1 (Securities and Exch v. Herula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Securities and Exch v. Herula, 311 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2003).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 02-1640

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, Appellee,

v.

MARTIN D. FIFE AND FAROUK KHAN,

Defendants, Appellants.

DENNIS S. HERULA, MARY LEE CAPALBO (AKA MARY LEE CAPALBO HERULA), SEAVIEW DEVELOPMENT & HOLDINGS, LTD., MICHAEL CLARKE, ROBERT WACHTEL, JOHAN HERTZOG, and CHARLES SULLIVAN,

Defendants,

and

DAVID ULLOM,

Relief-Defendant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on November 6, 2002 is amended as follows:

The second sentence of the second full paragraph on page 8 is amended to read:

Unlike the Second Circuit, we have not removed irreparable harm from the preliminary injunction inquiry in SEC preliminary injunction actions. SEC v. World Radio Mission, 544 F.2d 535, 541- 42 (1st Cir. 1976) (reversing the district court's finding that the denial of injunctive relief will not cause any harm to the public, irreparable or otherwise); see also SEC v. Lehman Bros., Inc., 157 F.3d 2, 9 (1st Cir. 1998) (finding that there was no obvious harm in allowing appellant lienholder to maintain the escrow allegedly secured by debtor through unlawful insider trading).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
311 F.3d 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/securities-and-exch-v-herula-ca1-2003.