Secret Lopez v. County of Los Angeles

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJune 17, 2022
Docket2:21-cv-08794
StatusUnknown

This text of Secret Lopez v. County of Los Angeles (Secret Lopez v. County of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Secret Lopez v. County of Los Angeles, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-08794-FMO-PVC Document 25 Filed 06/17/22 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:223

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ) 12 SECRET LOPEZ, ) No. 2:21-cv-08794-FMO-PVCx ) 13 Plaintiffs, ) ) PROTECTIVE ORDER RE PRODUCTION OF 14 ) CONFIDENTIAL PEACE ) OFFICER PERSONNEL 15 vs. ) INFORMATION ) 16 ) COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al. ) 17 ) Defendants. ) 18 ) 19 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that: 21 The COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES (“County or LASD”) is producing, 22 pursuant to Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests Deputy Elizabeth Tarin’s Personnel 23 Records, documents which are deemed confidential, under California state law. See 24 Cal. Pen Code §§ 832.7. The below-listed documents are produced pursuant to Court 25 Order; and, are produced pursuant to the privacy considerations recognized by the 26 federal court subject to a protective order. See Kelly v. City of San Jose, 114 F.R.D. 27 653, 656 (N.D. Cal. 1987; and Miller v. Pancucci, 141 F.R.D. 292, 300 (C.D. Cal. 28 1992). -1- Case 2:21-cv-08794-FMO-PVC Document 25 Filed 06/17/22 Page 2 of 8 Page ID #:224

1 1. All internal affairs investigations of ELIZABETH TARIN, for use of 2 force, including the underlying incident, and any prior or subsequent incident(s) 3 involving Defendant ELIZABETH TARIN. (Collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL 4 INFORMATION.”) 5 2. All investigations of ELIZABETH TARIN by the County of Los Angeles 6 District Attorney’s Office, the California Attorney General, the FBI, the United States 7 Attorney’s Office General’s Office, the Office of the United States Attorney or Office 8 of Civil Rights. (Collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”) The County 9 will produce such documents to the extent the County has access or control over said 10 documents. 11 3. All investigations by any of the County’s employees of defendant 12 ELIZABETH TARIN, for any allegation(s) that Defendant was involved in any 13 manner with a deputy gang, such as the “Jump Out Boys,” “300 Boyz,” “Banditos,” 14 “Executioners,” “Reapers,” “Cavemen,” “Regulators,” or the “Vikings.” 15 (Collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”) 16 4. A copy of the County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department discipline file 17 of ELIZABETH TARIN, including any record of discipline for use of force. 18 (Collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”) 19 5. All use of force reports within the past ten (10) years involving 20 ELIZABETH TARIN, where a civilian or suspect suffered greatly bodily injury or 21 death. (Collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”) 22 6. All use of force reports within the past ten (10) years involving 23 ELIZABETH TARIN. (Collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”) 24 7. A copy of all use of force reports or memorandum within the past ten 25 (10) years where Defendant ELIZABETH TARIN used any type force on any person, 26 including but not limited to her use of fists, batons, tasers, or any other type of 27 weapon. (Collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”) 28 -2- Case 2:21-cv-08794-FMO-PVC Document 25 Filed 06/17/22 Page 3 of 8 Page ID #:225

1 8. Any record relating to any incident(s) in which a sustained finding was 2 made that defendant ELIZABETH TARIN engaged in dishonesty directly relating to 3 the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime, or directly related to the 4 reporting of, or investigation of misconduct by any other Los Angeles Sheriff's 5 employee. (Collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”) 6 9. Any record relating to any incident(s) in which an unsustained finding 7 was made that defendant ELIZABETH TARIN engaged in dishonesty directly relating 8 to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime, or directly related to the 9 reporting of, or investigation of misconduct by any other Los Angeles Sheriff's 10 employee. (Collectively, “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.”) 11 10. All documents produced by the County or the Los Angeles Sheriff’s 12 Department in the categories set forth above shall be marked “CONFIDENTIAL.” If 13 the first page of any multi-page document bears this legend, then the entire document 14 is deemed confidential, unless otherwise indicated by the producing party. The 15 stamping of the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” is for identification purposes only, and in 16 the event that a document produced by the Probation Department pursuant to Court 17 Order is inadvertently not stamped with the legend “CONFIDENTIAL,” such 18 document is still subject to the provisions of this Protective Order. 19 11. All documents produced by the County subsequent to the entry of this 20 Protective Order shall be subject to this Protective Order, and shall be deemed 21 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. 22 12. All CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION provided in accordance with this 23 Order may be used for all proceedings in this matter only, including law and motion, 24 trial and/or appeal. However, in the event that CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION is 25 used in any such proceedings, the party submitting the CONFIDENTIAL 26 INFORMATION must seek an order sealing that portion of the record. 27 13. If any information and/or documents which are the subject of this 28 Protective Order are presented to this or any other court in any other manner prior to -3- Case 2:21-cv-08794-FMO-PVC Document 25 Filed 06/17/22 Page 4 of 8 Page ID #:226

1 the time of trial, said information and/or documents shall be lodged under seal, 2 pursuant to Local Rule 79-5.1, and with an appropriate application made to United 3 States District Magistrate Judge PEDRO V. CASTILLO, for lodging under seal, in an 4 envelope clearly marked as follows: 5 6 “CONFIDENTIAL AND MATERIAL SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER. CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-08794- 7 FMO-PVC.” 8 9 14. Testimony taken at any deposition, conference, hearing, or trial may be 10 designated as confidential by making a statement to that effect on the record at the 11 deposition or proceeding. Arrangements shall be made by counsel for the parties with 12 the Court Reporter transcribing such proceedings to separately bind such portions of 13 the transcript containing information designated as confidential, and to label such 14 portions accordingly. In the event that the Court rules that the CONFIDENTIAL 15 INFORMATION is admissible, then the Court and/or jury may review said 16 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION in open court in order to determine issues before 17 the Court. 18 15. All CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION produced in accordance with 19 this order shall not be used in any deposition, legal proceeding, or in any other forum 20 than the instant case, nor shall the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION be 21 disseminated in any form, except by court order, or until such time as the 22 “CONFIDENTIAL” designation is removed by agreement of counsel for the parties or 23 by further order of this Court. 24 16. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION shall be viewed only by: (1) the 25 Court and its staff; (2) counsel of record for the respective parties, including 26 associates, clerks, and secretarial staff for such parties, (3) independent experts 27 retained by the parties (and approved by the other parties), and (4) any associates, 28 assistants, and secretarial personnel of such experts and other persons designated by agreement of counsel for the parties, and so long as said experts have agreed in -4- Case 2:21-cv-08794-FMO-PVC Document 25 Filed 06/17/22 Page 5 of 8 Page ID #:227

1 writing in advance of any disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION to be 2 bound by this Protective Order. In the event that an individual does not consent to be 3 bound by this Protective Order, no disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 4 will be made to such individual. The Court and its staff may review all matters, which 5 pertain to the discussion of the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION, including law 6 and motion matters, consistent with this confidentiality agreement in respect to the 7 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gagne v. Ralph Pill Electric Supply Co.
114 F.R.D. 22 (D. Maine, 1987)
Miller v. Pancucci
141 F.R.D. 292 (C.D. California, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Secret Lopez v. County of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/secret-lopez-v-county-of-los-angeles-cacd-2022.