Second American Building Ass'n v. Platt

5 Duer 675
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided June 4, 1856·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Duer, J.,

held, that the provision in the mortgage was not to be limited to an exercise of the power of sale by advertising, ac[676] cording to statute, but by its reasonable interpretation, operated as an extension of the term of credit, so as to preclude the association from commencing any action upon the mortgage until the expiration of six months from the time any monthly payment, remaining unpaid, had become due; and hence, that the complaint, as it did not allege nor show that there had been a default in any one monthly payment for that period, was fatally defective.

Demurrer allowed, with liberty to plaintiff to amend complaint within twenty days; costs to the defendant, to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Second American Building Ass'n v. Platt, 5 Duer 675 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1856).

5 Duer 675 (Second American Building Ass'n v. Platt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rochester Savings Bank v. Whitmore
25 A.D. 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Central Trust Co. v. New York City & Northern Railroad
40 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 513 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)