Secom International Inc. v. A.C.E. Elevator Co.

266 A.D.2d 111, 698 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12069

This text of 266 A.D.2d 111 (Secom International Inc. v. A.C.E. Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Secom International Inc. v. A.C.E. Elevator Co., 266 A.D.2d 111, 698 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about April 23, 1999, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The conflicting inferences that may be drawn from the evidence raise questions of fact precluding summary judgment [112]*112(see, Morris v Lenox Hill Hosp., 232 AD2d 184, 185, affd 90 NY2d 953), including, inter alia, whether the equipment was accepted, whether the equipment provided by plaintiff was defective, and whether plaintiff properly met its contractual obligation for installation of the equipment. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Tom, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morris v. Lenox Hill Hospital
688 N.E.2d 255 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Morris v. Lenox Hill Hospital
232 A.D.2d 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 111, 698 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12069, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/secom-international-inc-v-ace-elevator-co-nyappdiv-1999.