Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Secom International Inc. v. A.C.E. Elevator Co.

Secom International Inc. v. A.C.E. Elevator Co.

266 A.D.2d 111, 698 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12069
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 23, 1999·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about April 23, 1999, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The conflicting inferences that may be drawn from the evidence raise questions of fact precluding summary judgment [112]*112(see, Morris v Lenox Hill Hosp., 232 AD2d 184, 185, affd 90 NY2d 953), including, inter alia, whether the equipment was accepted, whether the equipment provided by plaintiff was defective, and whether plaintiff properly met its contractual obligation for installation of the equipment. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Tom, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Secom International Inc. v. A.C.E. Elevator Co., 266 A.D.2d 111, 698 N.Y.S.2d 478, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12069 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 111 (Secom International Inc. v. A.C.E. Elevator Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. Lenox Hill Hospital
688 N.E.2d 255 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Morris v. Lenox Hill Hospital
232 A.D.2d 184 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)