Secola v. Phillips
652 So. 2d 1259, 1995 WL 150481
Opinion
Dianne SECOLA, Appellant,
v.
Jerry PHILLIPS and the Department of H.R.S., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*1260 Maureen Logue McGill, Pensacola, for appellant.
No appearance for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Although we are sympathetic with appellant's contention that visitation between F.G., a dependent child, and her half-siblings would be in F.G.'s best interest, we are not aware of any statutory or other authority that would vest the trial court with jurisdiction to order such visitation. Accordingly, we affirm the order on appeal.
ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Secola v. Phillips, 652 So. 2d 1259, 1995 WL 150481 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
652 So. 2d 1259 (Secola v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DeGrenier v. Reid
716 N.E.2d 667 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1999)
Youmans v. Ramos
711 N.E.2d 165 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1999)