Secola v. Phillips
This text of 652 So. 2d 1259 (Secola v. Phillips) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dianne SECOLA, Appellant,
v.
Jerry PHILLIPS and the Department of H.R.S., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
*1260 Maureen Logue McGill, Pensacola, for appellant.
No appearance for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Although we are sympathetic with appellant's contention that visitation between F.G., a dependent child, and her half-siblings would be in F.G.'s best interest, we are not aware of any statutory or other authority that would vest the trial court with jurisdiction to order such visitation. Accordingly, we affirm the order on appeal.
ERVIN, MINER and WOLF, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
652 So. 2d 1259, 1995 WL 150481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/secola-v-phillips-fladistctapp-1995.