Seckinger v. Proby

366 So. 2d 475
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 9, 1979·No. Nos. 77-1107, 77-1108 and 77-1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rouse v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc., 506 F.2d 410, 415-16 (5th Cir. 1975); Consolidated Systems, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 411 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1969); Atlantic National Insurance Co. v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 211 F.Supp. 878 (S.D.Fla.1962); Continental Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Fire & Marine Insurance Co., 163 F.Supp. 325 (S.D.1958); 16 Couch on Insurance § 62:79 (2d ed. Anderson 166); Anno. 69 A.L.R.2d 1122 (1960).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seckinger v. Proby, 366 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

366 So. 2d 475 (Seckinger v. Proby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Martin
366 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)