Seckinger v. Proby

366 So. 2d 475
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 1979
DocketNos. 77-1107, 77-1108 and 77-1955
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 366 So. 2d 475 (Seckinger v. Proby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seckinger v. Proby, 366 So. 2d 475 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rouse v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc., 506 F.2d 410, 415-16 (5th Cir. 1975); Consolidated Systems, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 411 F.2d 157 (5th Cir. 1969); Atlantic National Insurance Co. v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 211 F.Supp. 878 (S.D.Fla.1962); Continental Casualty Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Fire & Marine Insurance Co., 163 F.Supp. 325 (S.D.1958); 16 Couch on Insurance § 62:79 (2d ed. Anderson 166); Anno. 69 A.L.R.2d 1122 (1960).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Martin v. Martin
366 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
366 So. 2d 475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seckinger-v-proby-fladistctapp-1979.