Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart Co., Incorporated
184 N.E. 107, 260 N.Y. 593, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 787
This text of 184 N.E. 107 (Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart Co., Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart Co., Incorporated, 184 N.E. 107, 260 N.Y. 593, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 787 (N.Y. 1932).
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 259 N. Y. 353.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.
182 N.E. 14 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
184 N.E. 107, 260 N.Y. 593, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seckendorff-v-halsey-stuart-co-incorporated-ny-1932.