Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart Co., Incorporated

184 N.E. 107, 260 N.Y. 593, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 787
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 1932·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 259 N. Y. 353.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart Co., Incorporated, 184 N.E. 107, 260 N.Y. 593, 1932 N.Y. LEXIS 787 (N.Y. 1932).

184 N.E. 107 (Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart Co., Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seckendorff v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.
182 N.E. 14 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)