Sechrist v. Social Security Administration

D. New Mexico

Sechrist v. Social Security Administration

District Court, D. New Mexico·Decided September 17, 2021·No. 1:21-cv-00009·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DAVID SECHRIST, Plaintiff, V. No. CV 21-00009 CG ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMAND UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi's Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings (the “Motion”), (Doc. 23), filed September 15, 2021. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, and noting it is unopposed, finds the Motion is well-taken and shall be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision in this matter is REVERSED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings." IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 The Court will enter a separate order of final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DAVID SECHRIST, Plaintiff, V. No. CV 21-00009 CG ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO REMAND UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi's Unopposed Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings (the “Motion”), (Doc. 23), filed September 15, 2021. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, and noting it is unopposed, finds the Motion is well-taken and shall be GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision in this matter is REVERSED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings." IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 The Court will enter a separate order of final judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

Sechrist v. Social Security Administration, (D.N.M. 2021).

Pincite

Sechrist v. Social Security Administration (Sechrist v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related