Home/Louisiana Court of Appeal/Secari v. Uchello

Secari v. Uchello

42 So. 2d 100, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 600
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 4, 1949
DocketNo. 19401.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 42 So. 2d 100 (Secari v. Uchello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Secari v. Uchello, 42 So. 2d 100, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 600 (La. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

Appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal because of alleged insufficiency in the amount of the appeal bond. No effort was made by appellee in the trial court to call upon appellant to supplement the bond.

Since Act 112 of 1916 was adopted, an appeal may not be dismissed in the appellate court for the reason urged, unless *Page 101 the procedure prescribed in that statute was followed in the trial court. See Succession of Lissa, 194 La. 328, 193 So. 663; Durel v. Buchanan, 147 La. 804, 86 So. 189; Garland v. Keen, 18 La. App. 312, 137 So. 343.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ray v. Marquez
82 So. 2d 786 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 So. 2d 100, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/secari-v-uchello-lactapp-1949.