Secallus v. Muscarelle
597 A.2d 1083, 126 N.J. 288, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 803
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 245 N.J.Super. 535, 586 A.2d 305 (1991).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, and STEIN — 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Secallus v. Muscarelle, 597 A.2d 1083, 126 N.J. 288, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 803 (N.J. 1991).
597 A.2d 1083 (Secallus v. Muscarelle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bradford v. Kupper Associates
662 A.2d 1004 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
Vitty v. DCP CORP.
633 A.2d 1040 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Stevenson v. Keene Corp.
603 A.2d 521 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)