SEC. Title Ins. Guar. v. S.C. of Los Angeles Cty.

California Court of Appeal

SEC. Title Ins. Guar. v. S.C. of Los Angeles Cty.

17 P.2d 1049, 128 Cal. App. 781

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 12, 1933

DocketDocket No. 8683.

StatusPublished

This text of 17 P.2d 1049 (SEC. Title Ins. Guar. v. S.C. of Los Angeles Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SEC. Title Ins. Guar. v. S.C. of Los Angeles Cty., 17 P.2d 1049, 128 Cal. App. 781 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

A receiver having been appointed by the Superior Court of Los Angeles County at the instance of a creditor of Long Beach Escrow and Title Company, a corporation, in an action founded upon a promissory note, the instant proceeding was instituted praying a writ of prohibition to restrain said court and receiver from marshaling and distributing the assets of said corporation, in such receivership matter.

[1] The principles announced in Moore v. Superior Court,127 Cal.App. 692 [16 P.2d 324], decided November 26, 1932, are in all essentials applicable to the proceeding before us at this time, and require us to hold that the order appointing a receiver and all proceedings had thereunder were null and void.

The writ is granted as prayed.

Works, P.J., and Stephens, J., concurred. *Page 782

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE IS BLANK.] *Page 783

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI