Sebring v. Wheedon

8 Johns. 458
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sebring v. Wheedon. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 Johns. 460
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1811·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment must be reversed. There is nothing upon the return, showing that the defendant was proceeded against as a freeholder, or inhabitant having a family, and the requisite evidence given to authorize a warrant against a person of that description. The 4th section of the act (sess. 31. c. 204.) declares, that in all other cases, on the return of a warrant, if either party require an adjournment, and will give a sufficient security to appear and stand trial, the justice shall adjourn to some future day, not less than three, and not more than twelve days. The present case falls under this branch of the act, and the justice was bound to ad-, journ, on the security being tendered, without requiring an oath of the want of a material witness.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sebring v. Wheedon, 8 Johns. 458 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).

8 Johns. 458 (Sebring v. Wheedon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.