Sebring Trucking Co. v. White

187 F.2d 486
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 26, 1951·No. 11121_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel ;

And it appearing that appellant’s complaint that the verdict and judgment in favor of appellee in the amount of $27,500.-00 for personal injuries, property damage and medical expenses arising out of a collision between appellant’s automobile and appellee’s tractor-trailer, is excessive, was considered and rejected by the trial judge in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial;

And such ruling by the trial judge being reviewable only for abuse of discretion, and no such abuse being shown. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Pratt, 6 Cir., 2 F.2d 193; Spero-Nelson v. Brown, 6 Cir., 175 F.2d 86, 89; Scott v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 3 Cir., 151 F.2d 61, 64-65.

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sebring Trucking Co. v. White, 187 F.2d 486 (6th Cir. 1951).

187 F.2d 486 (Sebring Trucking Co. v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related