Sebring Pottery Co. v. Steubenville Pottery Co.

9 F. Supp. 384, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1223
District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided December 11, 1934·No. 3955·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

JONES, District Judge.

Upon due consideration, the exceptions to the report of the special master in respect of accounting, award of damages, and counsel fees will be overruled, except as to the allowance of counsel fees. The recommended allowance for a case of the proportions of this one seems to me to be in excess of an amount which a court might reasonably allow. To avoid any question of irregularity in respect of the master’s consideration and recommendation of counsel fees, it is the independent judgment of this court that the sum of $1,800 represents a reasonable attorney’s fee to be allowed the plaintiff.

Report of master in other respects approved and confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sebring Pottery Co. v. Steubenville Pottery Co., 9 F. Supp. 384, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1223 (N.D. Ohio 1934).

9 F. Supp. 384 (Sebring Pottery Co. v. Steubenville Pottery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. Pro Arts, Inc.
366 F. Supp. 474 (N.D. Ohio, 1973)
Davis v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Company
249 F. Supp. 329 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Burndy Engineering Co. v. Sheldon Service Corp.
39 F. Supp. 274 (E.D. New York, 1941)