Sebring Pottery Co. v. Steubenville Pottery Co.

9 F. Supp. 384, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1223
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio
DecidedDecember 11, 1934
Docket3955
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 9 F. Supp. 384 (Sebring Pottery Co. v. Steubenville Pottery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sebring Pottery Co. v. Steubenville Pottery Co., 9 F. Supp. 384, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1223 (N.D. Ohio 1934).

Opinion

JONES, District Judge.

Upon due consideration, the exceptions to the report of the special master in respect of accounting, award of damages, and counsel fees will be overruled, except as to the allowance of counsel fees. The recommended allowance for a case of the proportions of this one seems to me to be in excess of an amount which a court might reasonably allow. To avoid any question of irregularity in respect of the master’s consideration and recommendation of counsel fees, it is the independent judgment of this court that the sum of $1,800 represents a reasonable attorney’s fee to be allowed the plaintiff.

Report of master in other respects approved and confirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell v. Pro Arts, Inc.
366 F. Supp. 474 (N.D. Ohio, 1973)
Davis v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Company
249 F. Supp. 329 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Burndy Engineering Co. v. Sheldon Service Corp.
39 F. Supp. 274 (E.D. New York, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 F. Supp. 384, 1934 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sebring-pottery-co-v-steubenville-pottery-co-ohnd-1934.