Sebering v. Bastedo

67 N.W. 148, 48 Neb. 358, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 43
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided May 6, 1896·No. No. 6654·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Ryan, C.

In this case the only question presented is the right of plaintiffs in error, as residents and citizens of the town of Spencer, to contest the validity of the county seat election in Boyd county, whereby Butte City, upon the face of the returns as against Spencer, was declared by the canvassing board to have been successful. The district court of Boyd county dismissed this action as having been brought too late, whereby it was held the said court had never had .jurisdiction. Whether it was without jurisdiction upon the ground alleged need not be discussed, for certainly the disposition made of the case was proper, under the ruling of this court in Thomas v. Franklin, 42 Neb., 310. The judgment of the district court is therefore

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sebering v. Bastedo, 67 N.W. 148, 48 Neb. 358, 1896 Neb. LEXIS 43 (Neb. 1896).

67 N.W. 148 (Sebering v. Bastedo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. City of Indianola
179 N.W. 927 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1920)
Ashley v. Richard
185 P. 1076 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1919)
Barnes v. City of Lincoln
124 N.W. 99 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1909)