Sebel v. Guilfoyle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Sebel v. Guilfoyle

8 Ohio Law. Abs. 427, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1024

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 12, 1930

DocketNo 3691

StatusPublished

This text of 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 427 (Sebel v. Guilfoyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sebel v. Guilfoyle, 8 Ohio Law. Abs. 427, 1930 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 1024 (Ohio Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

CUSHING, PJ.

The only question for the consideration of this Court is whether 8621 GC, applies to agreements made between real estate brokers with reference to the payment of commission.

The question before this court was considered by the Supreme Court of Ohio in the case of Cohen v. Spitz Co., 121 Ohio St., 1 (166 N. E. 804). In that case the Court held that the statute applied not only to oral agreements between owner and broker, but .also to those made between the broker and a third person.

Upon authority of the case of Cohen v. Spitz Co., supra, the judgment of the court of Common Pleas will be reversed, and the cause will be remanded to that court with instructions to enter judgment in favor of Samuel Sebel.

Ross and Hamilton, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI