Sebby v. Libby
This text of 190 N.W.2d 776 (Sebby v. Libby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Certiorari to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission which denied employee’s claim that her neurotic condition was a previous disability which combined with her work-related injury to produce permanent and total disability.
The commission’s decision in this particular case that employee’s neurotic condition did not combine with her work-related injury to [534]*534cause permanent and total disability is supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted. We affirm the commission’s decision. Our affirmance of this issue is determinative of all other contentions raised by appellant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 N.W.2d 776, 291 Minn. 533, 1971 Minn. LEXIS 1072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sebby-v-libby-minn-1971.