Sebastian v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Sebastian v. State

203 S.W.3d 637, 361 Ark. 14

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedFebruary 17, 2005

Docket05-114

StatusPublished

This text of 203 S.W.3d 637 (Sebastian v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sebastian v. State, 203 S.W.3d 637, 361 Ark. 14 (Ark. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Ray Sebastian, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Brenda Stallings, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant Ray Sebastian, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Brenda Stallings, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

203 S.W.3d 637, 361 Ark. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sebastian-v-state-ark-2005.