Sebastian H. Jiminez v. Bertram Rice, Warden
222 F.3d 1210, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9324, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7036, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21110
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sebastian H. Jiminez v. Bertram Rice, Warden. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 F.3d 1277 →
Opinion
222 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 2000)
SEBASTIAN H. JIMINEZ, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
BERTRAM RICE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 99-15574
Office of the Circuit Executive
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Argued and Submitted April 10, 2000--San Francisco, California
Filed August 22, 2000
NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION SEE 246 F.3d 1277.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sebastian H. Jiminez v. Bertram Rice, Warden, 222 F.3d 1210, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 9324, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7036, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 21110 (9th Cir. 2000).
222 F.3d 1210 (Sebastian H. Jiminez v. Bertram Rice, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sebastian H. Jiminez v. Bertram Rice, Warden
246 F.3d 1277 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Jiminez v. Rice
222 F.3d 1210 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)