Sebastian C. Sisti v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Incorporated Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Incorporated

43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40088, 1994 WL 704537
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 1994
Docket94-1004
StatusUnpublished

This text of 43 F.3d 1468 (Sebastian C. Sisti v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Incorporated Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sebastian C. Sisti v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Incorporated Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Incorporated, 43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40088, 1994 WL 704537 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

43 F.3d 1468

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Sebastian C. SISTI, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INCORPORATED;
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith,
Incorporated, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1004.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 28, 1994
Decided: December 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-590-R)

Sebastian C. Sisti, Appellant Pro Se. Terri Lee Reicher, John Joseph Flood, Associate General Counsel, National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., Washington, D.C.; James E. Farnham, Edward Joseph Fuhr, Hunton & Williams, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying declaratory relief. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Sisti v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, No. CA-93-590-R (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 1993). We deny Appellant's Motion for Sanctions and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 F.3d 1468, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40088, 1994 WL 704537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sebastian-c-sisti-v-national-association-of-securities-dealers-ca4-1994.