Seay v. State

728 So. 2d 1181, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 936, 1999 WL 44066
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 1999·No. No. 96-04336·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Seay challenges his conviction and sentence as a career criminal for an offense occurring on January 6,1996. We affirm the conviction and reverse for resentencing pursuant to Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

In Thompson, this court held that chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which created career criminal sentencing, is unconstitutional because it violates the single subject rule. Accordingly, based on Thompson, we reverse Seay’s violent career criminal sentence and remand for resentencing. Our resolution of this matter makes it unnecessary to address the other sentencing issues.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND, AC.J., and GREEN and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seay v. State, 728 So. 2d 1181, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 936, 1999 WL 44066 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

728 So. 2d 1181 (Seay v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Seay
758 So. 2d 93 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Valdes v. State
728 So. 2d 1225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)