Seay v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seay v. State

728 So. 2d 1181, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 936, 1999 WL 44066

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 3, 1999

DocketNo. 96-04336

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 728 So. 2d 1181 (Seay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seay v. State, 728 So. 2d 1181, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 936, 1999 WL 44066 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shawn Seay challenges his conviction and sentence as a career criminal for an offense occurring on January 6,1996. We affirm the conviction and reverse for resentencing pursuant to Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).

In Thompson, this court held that chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which created career criminal sentencing, is unconstitutional because it violates the single subject rule. Accordingly, based on Thompson, we reverse Seay’s violent career criminal sentence and remand for resentencing. Our resolution of this matter makes it unnecessary to address the other sentencing issues.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

ALTENBERND, AC.J., and GREEN and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI