Seay v. State

55 So. 611, 172 Ala. 382, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 201
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 16, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 55 So. 611 (Seay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seay v. State, 55 So. 611, 172 Ala. 382, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 201 (Ala. 1911).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

The order of the trial court fixed the number of jurors for the special venire at 90, including those drawn and summoned on the regular juries for the week. Sixty names were drawn for the regular juries, hut only 47 of these were summoned; and, to complete the venire, only 30 additional names were drawn and summoned. The result was that the special venire contained only 77 names, instead of 90, and was in violation of section 32 of the new jury law. On the authority of Jackson v. State, 171 Ala. 38, 55 South. 118, the judgment of conviction will be reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Dowdell, C. J., and Anderson and Sayre^ JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. State
55 So. 118 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 So. 611, 172 Ala. 382, 1911 Ala. LEXIS 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seay-v-state-ala-1911.