Seay v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS.
565 A.2d 159, 523 Pa. 105
Opinion
Andre SEAY, Appellant,
v.
PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A SUBSIDIARY OF PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Allen L. Feingold, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Donald J.P. Sweeney, Andrew Siegeltuch, Philadelphia, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
*106 ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
LARSEN, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seay v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS., 565 A.2d 159, 523 Pa. 105 (Pa. 1989).
565 A.2d 159 (Seay v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seay v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
565 A.2d 159 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)