Seay v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS.
565 A.2d 159, 523 Pa. 105
This text of 565 A.2d 159 (Seay v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seay v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CAS., 565 A.2d 159, 523 Pa. 105 (Pa. 1989).
Opinion
Andre SEAY, Appellant,
v.
PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A SUBSIDIARY OF PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Allen L. Feingold, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Donald J.P. Sweeney, Andrew Siegeltuch, Philadelphia, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
*106 ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.
LARSEN, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Seay v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
565 A.2d 159 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
565 A.2d 159, 523 Pa. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seay-v-prudential-property-cas-pa-1989.