Seay v. O'Brien

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 2011
Docket10-6435
StatusUnpublished

This text of Seay v. O'Brien (Seay v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seay v. O'Brien, (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6435

BOBBY D. SEAY,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

TERRY O’BRIEN, Warden, USP Lee County,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (7:09-cv-00361-jct-mfu)

Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: February 9, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bobby D. Seay, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bobby D. Seay, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Seay v. O’Brien, No. 7:09-cv-00361-jct-

mfu (W.D. Va. Mar. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Seay v. O'Brien, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seay-v-obrien-ca4-2011.