Seavey v. Roberts

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Seavey v. Roberts

3 A. 634, 63 N.H. 621

DecidedDecember 5, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A. 634 (Seavey v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seavey v. Roberts, 3 A. 634, 63 N.H. 621 (N.H. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

The estate of Jewett Wrisley has no claim to the legacy in any view of the case; and this being so, it is obvious that as administrator de bonis non of that estate, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover it. The probate court having decreed otherwise, the appeal is sustained, and the

Decree reversed.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blodgett, J.

The estate of Jewett Wrisley has no claim to the legacy in any view of the case; and this being so, it is obvious that as administrator de bonis non of that estate, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover it. The probate court having decreed otherwise, the appeal is sustained, and the

Decree reversed.

Carpenter, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A. 634, 63 N.H. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seavey-v-roberts-nh-1885.