Seavey v. Maples

Indiana Supreme Court

Seavey v. Maples

94 Ind. 603, 1884 Ind. LEXIS 127

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 14, 1884

DocketNo. 10,945

StatusPublished

This text of 94 Ind. 603 (Seavey v. Maples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seavey v. Maples, 94 Ind. 603, 1884 Ind. LEXIS 127 (Ind. 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin, C.

This case is between the same parties, the same questions are presented, and the same briefs filed, as in the case of Seavey v. Maples, ante, p. 205, herewith decided. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment in this case must be affirmed.

Per Curiam. — It is therefore ordered, that the judgment of the court below be and it is in all things affirmed, with costs.

Zollars, J., did not participate, having been of counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin, C.

This case is between the same parties, the same questions are presented, and the same briefs filed, as in the case of Seavey v. Maples, ante, p. 205, herewith decided. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment in this case must be affirmed.

Per Curiam. — It is therefore ordered, that the judgment of the court below be and it is in all things affirmed, with costs.

Zollars, J., did not participate, having been of counsel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 Ind. 603, 1884 Ind. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seavey-v-maples-ind-1884.