Seattle Nat. Bank v. Pratt

Second Circuit

Seattle Nat. Bank v. Pratt

111 F. 841, 49 C.C.A. 662, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4437

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 18, 1901·No. No. 15·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts, as the judge below found, bring this case within the decision of this court in Hobbs v. Bank, 37 C. C. A. 513, 96 Fed. 396; Id., 41 C. C. A. 205, 101 Fed. 75. A three-years statute was applied in that case, and, since certiorari was r'efused by the supreme court, the rule laid down in the Hobbs Case will be followed here, viz. that such an action cannot be maintained against such stockholder in this state when action was not begun until more than three years after the cause of action accrued, and during that entire period defendant was a resident of this state.

Judgment affirmed, with costs’.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts, as the judge below found, bring this case within the decision of this court in Hobbs v. Bank, 37 C. C. A. 513, 96 Fed. 396; Id., 41 C. C. A. 205, 101 Fed. 75. A three-years statute was applied in that case, and, since certiorari was r'efused by the supreme court, the rule laid down in the Hobbs Case will be followed here, viz. that such an action cannot be maintained against such stockholder in this state when action was not begun until more than three years after the cause of action accrued, and during that entire period defendant was a resident of this state.

Judgment affirmed, with costs’.

Seattle Nat. Bank v. Pratt, 111 F. 841, 49 C.C.A. 662, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4437 (2d Cir. 1901).

Pincite

111 F. 841 (Seattle Nat. Bank v. Pratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related