Seattle Nat. Bank v. Pratt

Second Circuit

Seattle Nat. Bank v. Pratt

111 F. 841, 49 C.C.A. 662, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4437

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 18, 1901

DocketNo. 15

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 111 F. 841 (Seattle Nat. Bank v. Pratt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seattle Nat. Bank v. Pratt, 111 F. 841, 49 C.C.A. 662, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4437 (2d Cir. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts, as the judge below found, bring this case within the decision of this court in Hobbs v. Bank, 37 C. C. A. 513, 96 Fed. 396; Id., 41 C. C. A. 205, 101 Fed. 75. A three-years statute was applied in that case, and, since certiorari was r'efused by the supreme court, the rule laid down in the Hobbs Case will be followed here, viz. that such an action cannot be maintained against such stockholder in this state when action was not begun until more than three years after the cause of action accrued, and during that entire period defendant was a resident of this state.

Judgment affirmed, with costs’.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts, as the judge below found, bring this case within the decision of this court in Hobbs v. Bank, 37 C. C. A. 513, 96 Fed. 396; Id., 41 C. C. A. 205, 101 Fed. 75. A three-years statute was applied in that case, and, since certiorari was r'efused by the supreme court, the rule laid down in the Hobbs Case will be followed here, viz. that such an action cannot be maintained against such stockholder in this state when action was not begun until more than three years after the cause of action accrued, and during that entire period defendant was a resident of this state.

Judgment affirmed, with costs’.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

111 F. 841, 49 C.C.A. 662, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seattle-nat-bank-v-pratt-ca2-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack