Seattle Gas Co. v. Seattle

Supreme Court

Seattle Gas Co. v. Seattle

291 U.S. 638, 54 S. Ct. 550, 78 L. Ed. 1037, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 524

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 19, 1934

Docket359

StatusPublished

This text of 291 U.S. 638 (Seattle Gas Co. v. Seattle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seattle Gas Co. v. Seattle, 291 U.S. 638, 54 S. Ct. 550, 78 L. Ed. 1037, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 524 (1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the Court,

This case comes here on appeal under § 237 of the Judicial Code from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington, 172 Wash. 701; 21 P. (2d) 732, upholding a municipal license or excise tax, assailed by appellant as repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment and the contract clause of the Federal Constitution. The ordinance, which imposes a tax of 3% of the gross income from appellant’s business of furnishing gas to consumers in the City of Seattle, and the federal questions raised are the same as those in Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle, decided this day, ante, p. 619. Appellant’s bill of complaint, demurrer to which was sustained by the state court, alleges that the appellant is engaged in the distribution of gas, used for lighting in the City of Seattle, in competition with the city, the appellee, which conducts an electric light business, and that its constitutional rights are in *639 fringed by the imposition of the tax. Appellant ■ seeks recovery of an installment of the tax which it has paid, and an injunction restraining the collection of future installments. For the reasons stated at length in the opitiion in Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle, supra, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Van Devanter, Mr. Justice McReynolds, Mr. Justice Sutherland and Mr. Justice Butler, concur in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the Court,

This case comes here on appeal under § 237 of the Judicial Code from a judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington, 172 Wash. 701; 21 P. (2d) 732, upholding a municipal license or excise tax, assailed by appellant as repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment and the contract clause of the Federal Constitution. The ordinance, which imposes a tax of 3% of the gross income from appellant’s business of furnishing gas to consumers in the City of Seattle, and the federal questions raised are the same as those in Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle, decided this day, ante, p. 619. Appellant’s bill of complaint, demurrer to which was sustained by the state court, alleges that the appellant is engaged in the distribution of gas, used for lighting in the City of Seattle, in competition with the city, the appellee, which conducts an electric light business, and that its constitutional rights are in *639 fringed by the imposition of the tax. Appellant ■ seeks recovery of an installment of the tax which it has paid, and an injunction restraining the collection of future installments. For the reasons stated at length in the opitiion in Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle, supra, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Van Devanter, Mr. Justice McReynolds, Mr. Justice Sutherland and Mr. Justice Butler, concur in the result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 U.S. 638, 54 S. Ct. 550, 78 L. Ed. 1037, 1934 U.S. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seattle-gas-co-v-seattle-scotus-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack