Seattle Dock Co. v. Seattle & Lake Washington Waterway Co.

195 U.S. 624, 49 L. Ed. 350, 25 S. Ct. 789, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 668
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 31, 1904·No. No. 390; No. 391·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgments affirmed with costs.. New Orleans v. New Orleans Waterworks Company, 142 U. S. 79; Yesler v. Commissioners, 146 U. S. 646; Shively v. Bowlby, 152 U. S. 1; Allen v. Forrest, 8 Washington, 700; Mississippi Valley Trust Company v. Hafins, 20 Washington, 272, and these cases, 77 Pac. Rep. 845.

Mr. Julius F. Hale and Mr. Eugene Semple for defendants in error. v

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seattle Dock Co. v. Seattle & Lake Washington Waterway Co., 195 U.S. 624, 49 L. Ed. 350, 25 S. Ct. 789, 1904 U.S. LEXIS 668 (1904).

195 U.S. 624 (Seattle Dock Co. v. Seattle & Lake Washington Waterway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pierce v. Pierce
56 P.2d 336 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1936)