Seats v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Seats v. State

170 S.W. 719, 75 Tex. Crim. 227, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 458

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 11, 1914·No. No. 3317.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

—This is a conviction for assault to murder, the *228 punishment being assessed at two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a bill of exceptions or a statement of facts.

The motion for new trial is based upon the insufficiency of the evidence and refusal to give certain instructions, and errors in the charge. There was no exception reserved to the charge before it was read to the jury, and, in fact, no exception was reserved. The evidence not being before us the other matters can not be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

—This is a conviction for assault to murder, the *228 punishment being assessed at two years imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a bill of exceptions or a statement of facts.

The motion for new trial is based upon the insufficiency of the evidence and refusal to give certain instructions, and errors in the charge. There was no exception reserved to the charge before it was read to the jury, and, in fact, no exception was reserved. The evidence not being before us the other matters can not be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Seats v. State, 170 S.W. 719, 75 Tex. Crim. 227, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 458 (Tex. 1914).

Pincite

170 S.W. 719 (Seats v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.