Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. Borough of Edgewater

471 A.2d 439, 192 N.J. Super. 535, 1983 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1054
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided March 21, 1983·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We are persuaded, as was the Tax Court judge, that this matter is governed by the principles explicated in Newark v. Central & Lafayette Realty Co., Inc., 150 N.J.Super. 18 (App. Div.1977), certif. den. 75 N.J. 528 (1977). To the extent that Rothman v. River Edge, 149 N.J.Super. 435 (App.Div.1977), certif. den. 75 N.J. 19 (1977), decided one day earlier than Newark v. Central & Lafayette Realty Co., Inc., differs with the latter case, we prefer Newark v. Central & Lafayette Realty Co., Inc., not because it is later in time but because we believe it to be the better reasoned case.

We affirm, 4 N.J.Tax 378, substantially for the reasons set forth by the Tax Court judge in his written determination of May 26, 1982.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. Borough of Edgewater, 471 A.2d 439, 192 N.J. Super. 535, 1983 N.J. Super. LEXIS 1054 (N.J. Ct. App. 1983).

471 A.2d 439 (Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. Borough of Edgewater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Continental Apartment Associates v. City of East Orange
14 N.J. Tax 519 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1995)
Sabella v. Lacey Tp.
497 A.2d 896 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
Teltsher v. City of Orange
7 N.J. Tax 287 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1985)
O'NEILL v. Washington Tp.
475 A.2d 55 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Carisi v. Wax
471 A.2d 439 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)