Seaton v. Seaton

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Seaton v. Seaton

563 So. 2d 837, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5164, 1990 WL 98544

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 1990

DocketNo. 89-0502

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 563 So. 2d 837 (Seaton v. Seaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seaton v. Seaton, 563 So. 2d 837, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5164, 1990 WL 98544 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK, RICHARD H., Associate Judge.

We have reviewed each of the issues presented by the former husband in his attack upon the trial court’s resolution of this matter and have found no reversible error save as to the award of the former wife’s attorney’s fee. In addition to aspects of the fee evidence being inadequate to permit the fair assessment of a reasonable fee, the final judgment fails to disclose the specific findings essential to compliance with Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).

Accordingly, this matter is remanded for a redetermination of the wife’s attorney’s fee and the entry of an order complying [838]*838with Rowe. Calamore v. Calamore, 555 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI