Seaton v. Board of Education
This text of 253 A.D. 736 (Seaton v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order striking out paragraphs VIII and IX of the defendant’s answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to strike out denied, with ten dollars costs. The allegation that the claim was “ duly audited and allowed ” is sufficient in a pleading. A pleader is not required to set forth the evidence by which the material facts he alleges are to be proved, but it is sufficient if he make a plain and concise statement of those facts showing their legal effect. Hagarty, Davis, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D. 736, 300 N.Y.S. 633, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaton-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1937.